Repository navigation
Refactor LDP to use a modular store/backend - #702
Closed
dmitrizagidulin wants to merge 10 commits into
Closed
dmitrizagidulin wants to merge 10 commits into
dmitrizagidulin wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
This was referenced Jun 11, 2018
Merged
dmitrizagidulin
force-pushed
the
backend_refactor
branch
from
October 5, 2018 00:20
e0c627c to
b80b708
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
(rebased on latest |
RubenVerborgh
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
from
October 18, 2018 07:41
5468d85 to
8d9d3e7
Compare
Member
|
Oh, this was closed as I deleted the |
This was referenced Mar 4, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an in-place refactoring of the LDP backend code, to be able to move towards the architecture outlined here: Solid HTTP request handling flow.
To make the code review burden easier, it'll be done as a series of smaller PRs into this branch.
Addresses issue #483