Skip to content

OCPBUGS-57313: fix(api): Correct API server Modern TLS profile documentation - #3129

Open
rutvik23 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.20from
rutvik23:OCPBUGS-57313
Open

rutvik23 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.20from
rutvik23:OCPBUGS-57313

Conversation

@rutvik23

@rutvik23 rutvik23 commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Updates API server documentation to include Modern among supported TLS profiles and VersionTLS13 as the maximum minTLSVersion.

  • Removes the outdated shared statement that Modern is unsupported and
    updates generated API documentation and CRD manifests. No runtime or
    validation behavior changes.

  • Fixes OCPBUGS-57313

Additional info

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification

This PR uses the pipeline controller for second-stage tests. Selection and triggering follow the repository configuration.

Use /test ? to list jobs and /pipeline help for commands.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rutvik23: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57313, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.z" version, but no target version was set
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57313 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

  • Updates API server documentation to include Modern among supported TLS
    profiles and VersionTLS13 as the maximum minTLSVersion.

  • Removes the outdated shared statement that Modern is unsupported and
    updates generated API documentation and CRD manifests. No runtime or
    validation behavior changes.

  • Fixes OCPBUGS-57313

Additional info

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Central YAML; Path: .coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: fd23daba-3d3c-4b9c-9f24-4ece6b79fd6e

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review

Tip

🎯 Customize your risk assessments

Guide how CodeRabbit assesses merge risk and security architecture risk. Highlight sensitive changes and explain your security boundaries using Merge Risk Instructions and Security Risk Instructions in your review settings. Security architecture risk assessments require the Advanced plan or above.

✅ Automatic approvals, with your rules

Let CodeRabbit approve pull requests once required threads are resolved, pre-merge checks pass, and your risk limits are met. Enable Automatic approvals in review settings, with overrides for teams or file paths.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @rutvik23! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 26, 2026
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@everettraven

everettraven commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rutvik23 Is this intentionally only targeting 4.20? Has this already been updated on all newer branches?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 27, 2026
@rutvik23

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@rutvik23 Is this intentionally only targeting 4.20? Has this already been updated on all newer branches?

@everettraven

  • 4.22, 4.23, 5.0 looks good to me.
  • In 4.21, types_apiserver.go looks fine, but the reference in types_tlssecurityprofile.go is still contradictory at this place.

Let me know how we should approach to fix it in 4.21.

@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed
/label jira/valid-bug

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 3, 2026
Document Modern as a supported API server TLS profile and VersionTLS13
as the maximum minTLSVersion. Remove the outdated shared statement that
Modern is unsupported and regenerate API documentation and CRD manifests

Fixes OCPBUGS-57313

Signed-off by: rutvik23 <rkshirsa@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rutvik23: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rutvik23

rutvik23 commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@everettraven - please tag lgtm once again, I had to push for a nit change as I realized there's one more stale ref that need to be cleaned up - appreciate your patience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants