You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Every alias launch starts an AppX UpdateUsingAppInstaller operation - scheduled workloads grew AppXSvc to 22 GB and exhausted system commit #396
Every launch of the python.exe execution alias starts an AppX deployment operation in the background (UpdateUsingAppInstallerOperation, event 603 in AppXDeploymentServer/Operational). On a machine where scheduled jobs call bare python a few times a minute, those operations made AppXSvc's svchost grow to 22 GB of commit over 2.3 days, until total system commit ran out and every allocation-heavy process on the box started dying at once (all terminal windows, browsers, git). Windows kills whichever process asks for memory at the ceiling, not the service holding it, so the failure looked like random app crashes and took a while to trace back here.
The unbounded growth itself is arguably AppXSvc's problem, not pymanager's. I'm reporting it here because the per-launch deployment operation originates with the pymanager package, pymanager is in a position to avoid or debounce it, and I could not find this failure mode reported anywhere (searched this tracker for AppXSvc / leak / UpdateUsingAppInstaller before filing).
Environment
Windows 11 Home 25H2, build 26200.8875. AppXSvc ran with StartType=Automatic on this machine (i.e. permanently resident — which is what let the growth accumulate 24/7; it appears the Dec 2025 cumulative KB5072033 made it Automatic, it is Manual on stock systems).
Package name as it appears in the events: PythonSoftwareFoundation.PythonManager_26.3.240.0_x64__3847v3x7pw1km
Workload: a dozen-plus scheduled jobs (Task Scheduler plus a process manager) invoking bare python, which resolved to the WindowsApps alias.
What I measured
Event 603 fires for the PythonManager package on every alias launch. In the 20 most recent events before I changed my PATH, 20/20 were PythonManager UpdateUsingAppInstaller, with timestamps matching the schedulers' cadence exactly.
Final 24 h before reboot: 6,400 events (~266/h). Earlier in the same incident I measured ~58/h — the rate simply tracks how often something runs python.
AppXSvc's svchost reached 22 GB commit in 2.3 days. Its working set stayed small the whole time, so Task Manager's default view showed nothing unusual; Resource-Exhaustion-Detector (System log, event 2004) is what finally named it as the top commit consumer.
End state: commit ceiling hit (64 GB RAM + 27 GB pagefile). The svchost could not be stopped — taskkill /F as SYSTEM failed and sc stop returned 1061 — only a reboot released the memory.
Repro sketch
pymanager installed, its python.exe alias first on PATH.
AppXSvc resident (Automatic start, or started manually and left running).
Run python -c "pass" through the alias every 30-60 s with any scheduler.
Watch event 603 accumulate and the AppXSvc svchost's private bytes climb over hours.
Expected
Launching an already-installed interpreter shouldn't enqueue a deployment/update operation on every launch. Debouncing the check (once a day would be plenty) would make unattended workloads unable to grind AppXSvc regardless of the service-side leak.
Workaround that ended it
Real interpreter directory prepended to PATH, explicit interpreter paths in the scheduled jobs, AppXSvc back to demand start. After a reboot, event 603 went from ~266/h to zero across the same scheduled workload.
I can attach exported event logs (the 603 series and the event 2004 record) or run diagnostics on a live setup if that helps.
The unbounded growth itself is arguably AppXSvc's problem, not pymanager's.
No argument - it is 100% an OS issue, not ours. We're using the provided interfaces correctly, so this will need to be reported to Microsoft.
Best thing you can do is when it's reproducing, use Feedback Hub to send a problem report. That will collect the logs that the team expect and create a bug for them. Best to do this when the memory usage is high so that it can
I could not find this failure mode reported anywhere (searched this tracker for AppXSvc / leak / UpdateUsingAppInstaller before filing).
You'd need to search more broadly for an OS bug, since it is almost certainly not unique to Python.1 But you can't search Microsoft's internal database, so no big deal. You've analysed it more than most though, so wouldn't surprise me if there's nothing else out there.
I'm reporting it here because the per-launch deployment operation originates with the pymanager package, pymanager is in a position to avoid or debounce it
I'm interested how you would suggest avoiding it, without fundamentally rewriting our entire app. If you meant by rewriting the entire app, then that's clearly out, and the best hope would be to report it to the OS. But if you've got some other idea it'd be nice to hear about it.
Footnotes
There's a very small chance that Python is the only user of some OS feature, but I know there are plenty of other users of all the MSIX features we are using. ↩
Activity
zooba commentedon Aug 18, 2026
No argument - it is 100% an OS issue, not ours. We're using the provided interfaces correctly, so this will need to be reported to Microsoft.
Best thing you can do is when it's reproducing, use Feedback Hub to send a problem report. That will collect the logs that the team expect and create a bug for them. Best to do this when the memory usage is high so that it can
You'd need to search more broadly for an OS bug, since it is almost certainly not unique to Python.1 But you can't search Microsoft's internal database, so no big deal. You've analysed it more than most though, so wouldn't surprise me if there's nothing else out there.
I'm interested how you would suggest avoiding it, without fundamentally rewriting our entire app. If you meant by rewriting the entire app, then that's clearly out, and the best hope would be to report it to the OS. But if you've got some other idea it'd be nice to hear about it.
Footnotes
There's a very small chance that Python is the only user of some OS feature, but I know there are plenty of other users of all the MSIX features we are using. ↩