Skip to content

Meta: Would a governance topic be useful? #2987

Closed
#2993
Closed
Meta: Would a governance topic be useful?#2987
#2993
Labels
metaRelated to the repo itself and its processes

Description

@hugovk
hugovk
opened on Jan 30, 2023

We could group the language governance PEPs, plus the steering council election PEPs, and the various proposed models.

Here's a WIP branch:

(Opening an issue instead of a draft PR to avoid pinging two dozen codeowners.)

Activity

  1. hugovk
    added
    metaRelated to the repo itself and its processes
    on Jan 30, 2023

  2. JelleZijlstra commented on Jan 30, 2023

    @JelleZijlstra
    JelleZijlstra
    on Jan 30, 2023
    Member

    Makes sense to me!

  3. CAM-Gerlach commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @CAM-Gerlach
    CAM-Gerlach
    on Jan 31, 2023
    Member

    Seems fairly reasonable, but not entirely sure how much added value it brings given there's only two special case PEPs (which both should be in the top Process section), plus the whole 8xxx-series which is clearly differentiated by number. So, +0 from me.

  4. hugovk
    closed this as completedin #2993on Feb 2, 2023
  5. hugovk
    added a commit that references this issue on Feb 2, 2023

    Meta: Add a governance topic (#2993)

    5bdec96
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    metaRelated to the repo itself and its processes

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions