Repository navigation
_struct.Struct: calling functions without calling __init__ results in SystemError #78724
Description
Activity
>>> from _struct import Struct >>> s = Struct.__new__(Struct) >>> s.unpack_from(b'asdf') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> SystemError: /Objects/tupleobject.c:84: Bad argument to internal function
static PyObject * s_unpack_internal(PyStructObject *soself, const char *startfrom) { ... PyObject *result = PyTuple_New(soself->s_len); // soself->s_len is -1, set in Struct.__new__
- addedtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorextension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirC modules in the Modules dir3.7 (EOL)end of lifeend of life
on Aug 29, 2018 This exception goes back to at least Python 2.6 (if not older) but I'm not convinced it is a bug.
Calling __new__ alone is not guaranteed to initialise a new instance completely. The public API for creating an instance is to call the class object:
s = Struct()
not to call __new__. You bypassed the proper initialisation of the instance, resulting in a broken, half-initialised instance. When you tried to use it, it correctly raised an exception.
If this caused a crash or a seg fault, then it would be reasonable to report it as a bug, but it looks to me that this is behaving correctly.
If you disagree, please explain why you think it is a bug.
(Also, for the record, you shouldn't be importing Struct from the private module _struct, you should import it from the public struct module.)
Well, sometimes when i do
>>> b = bytearray() >>> s.pack_into(b)
application crashes (because it checks arg #1, which is not initialized).
Also, I imported from _struct, because it's where implementation of Struct really is._struct is a private implementation detail. You shouldn't use it. You shouldn't care where the implementation "really is" in your Python code, because it could move without warning. There are no backwards-compatibility guarantees for private modules like _struct.
But regardless of where you are importing it from, why are you calling Struct.__new__(Struct) in the first place? You should be calling Struct().
I still don't see any reason to consider this a bug. I can't reproduce your report of a crash:
py> from _struct import Struct py> s = Struct.__new__(Struct) py> b = bytearray() py> s.pack_into(b) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> SystemError: null argument to internal routine
I get an exception, which is the correct behaviour. Unless this segfaults, I don't believe this is a bug that needs fixing.
(By the way, Struct doesn't even have a __new__ method. You are calling the __new__ method inherited from object, which clearly knows nothing about how to initialise a Struct.)
(I wrote that I'm importing from _struct just for this issue.)
I've seen that tp_new of PyStructType is set to s_new in Modules/_struct.c.
And that crash is most likely caused by access to uninitialized memory, so it is not guaranteed.I've tried running this code in Python 3.6:
from _struct import Struct for i in range(100000): L = [Struct.__new__(Struct) for j in range(1000)] for s in L: try: x = s.pack_into(bytearray()) except SystemError: pass
I've run it 6 times, for a total of 600 million calls to Struct.__new__
and pack_into, and I cannot reproduce any crash or segfault. An
exception (SystemError) is the correct behaviour.Is anyone able to try it under Python 3.7?
Unless somebody is able to demonstrate a segfault or core dump, or
otherwise demonstrate a problem with the C code, I think this ticket
ought to be closed.IMHO SystemError is the wrong exception, that exception is primarily used to signal implementation errors.
BTW. I can reproduce crashes in a couple of runs of your scriptlet:
Python 3.7.0 (v3.7.0:1bf9cc5093, Jun 26 2018, 23:26:24) [Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from _struct import Struct >>> for i in range(100000): ... L = [Struct.__new__(Struct) for j in range(1000)] ... for s in L: ... try: ... x = s.pack_into(bytearray()) ... except SystemError: ... pass ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 5, in <module> TypeError: 'code' object cannot be interpreted as an integer >>> >>> from _struct import Struct >>> for i in range(100000): ... L = [Struct.__new__(Struct) for j in range(1000)] ... for s in L: ... try: ... x = s.pack_into(bytearray()) ... except SystemError: ... pass ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 5, in <module> TypeError: 'traceback' object cannot be interpreted as an integer >>> >>> >>> >>> from _struct import Struct >>> for i in range(100000): ... L = [Struct.__new__(Struct) for j in range(1000)] ... for s in L: ... try: ... x = s.pack_into(bytearray()) ... except SystemError: ... pass ... Segmentation fault: 11
Thanks for confirming the seg fault. I've changed this to a crasher.
Should we change the exception to RuntimeError?
- addedstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directoryStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpand removedextension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirC modules in the Modules dirtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
on Sep 3, 2018 31 remaining items
- added3.14bugs and security fixesbugs and security fixes3.15bugs and security fixesbugs and security fixes
on Jan 10, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Jan 11, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Jan 12, 2026 The original issue has been fixed. This is not the optimal way if we wrote this code from scratch, but this is a compatible way. The cost is pretty small.
- moved this to Done in Struct, memoryview and array issues 🏗️
on Jul 13, 2026
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Projects
- StatusShow more project fieldsDone
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
Linked PRs