Skip to content

__slots__ on PyVarObject subclass #61497

Description

@ronaldoussoren
BPO 17295
Nosy @ronaldoussoren, @amauryfa, @vstinner, @vadmium
Superseder
  • bpo-1173475: slots for subclasses of variable length types
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2013-02-25.16:24:22.254>
    labels = ['interpreter-core', 'type-bug']
    title = '__slots__ on PyVarObject subclass'
    updated_at = <Date 2015-03-12.05:27:03.174>
    user = 'https://github.com/ronaldoussoren'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2015-03-12.05:27:03.174>
    actor = 'martin.panter'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Interpreter Core']
    creation = <Date 2013-02-25.16:24:22.254>
    creator = 'ronaldoussoren'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 17295
    keywords = []
    message_count = 5.0
    messages = ['182959', '184637', '184640', '185397', '237914']
    nosy_count = 4.0
    nosy_names = ['ronaldoussoren', 'amaury.forgeotdarc', 'vstinner', 'martin.panter']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'low'
    resolution = 'duplicate'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = '1173475'
    type = 'behavior'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue17295'
    versions = ['Python 3.4']

    Activity

    1. ronaldoussoren commented on Feb 25, 2013

      @ronaldoussoren
      ContributorAuthor

      Currently a subclass of a PyVarObject (such as 'int') cannot use a non-empty slots, for example:

      >>> class L (int):
      ...    __slots__ = ('a', 'b')
      ... 
      Traceback (most recent call last):
        File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      TypeError: nonempty __slots__ not supported for subtype of 'int'
      >>> 

      However, subclasses that don't use __slots__ do have an implicit slot: the __dict__ value. Wouldn't it be possible to use the trick used for tp_dictoffset for slots as well, that is use negative values for the slot offsets and access them from the end of the object?

      The major problem with an implementation is that PyMember_GetOne has a 'char*' argument instead of a 'PyObject*' one, but that's easily changed (PyMember_GetOne is currently only called in Object/descrobject.c and that call casts PyObject* to char*. This would be an API change, but AFAIK PyMember_GetOne is not documented at the moment (and changing the argument type would be binary compatible).

      I hope to work on a patch in the near future.

    2. amauryfa commented on Mar 19, 2013

      @amauryfa
      Contributor

      Probably a duplicate of bpo-1173475. Do you want to work on the patch there?

    3. ronaldoussoren commented on Mar 19, 2013

      @ronaldoussoren
      ContributorAuthor

      You're right, this is a duplicate.

    4. vstinner commented on Mar 28, 2013

      @vstinner
      Member

      I closed the issue, but I didn't see that bpo-1173475 was closed. Sorry, I reopened this issue again.

    5. vadmium commented on Mar 12, 2015

      @vadmium
      Member

      Encountered this when trying to add some fields to urllib.parse.SplitResult for bpo-22852. bpo-1173475 has a patch; I haven’t tried using it though.

    6. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    7. encukou commented on Apr 24, 2023

      @encukou
      Member

      For this to work, the interpreter must know the type's memory layout.
      So, in 2023 in Python 3.12 3.13, we can solve it for types with PEP 697's Py_TPFLAGS_ITEMS_AT_END, but for tuple or int we'd need to make their layout known (possibly we could hardcode it for those types only, but even then, documenting what kind of access is safe re. other types or subclasses might turn out to be a PEP-sized chunk of work).

      Let's use gh-103740 for enabling this with Py_TPFLAGS_ITEMS_AT_END.

    8. erlend-aasland commented on Apr 24, 2023

      @erlend-aasland
      Contributor

      Let's use gh-103740 for enabling this with Py_TPFLAGS_ITEMS_AT_END.

      Let's close this as superseded by #103740, unless you have objections.

    9. ronaldoussoren commented on Apr 24, 2023

      @ronaldoussoren
      ContributorAuthor

      Let's use gh-103740 for enabling this with Py_TPFLAGS_ITEMS_AT_END.

      Let's close this as superseded by #103740, unless you have objections.

      Fine by me.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions