Skip to content

context variables can leak out of asyncio.Task #140947

Description

@pmeier

Bug report

Bug description:

This is a minimal reproducer for Kludex/uvicorn#2167. TL;DR when using asyncio as event loop, users of uvicorn were seeing polluted contexts after sending in large payloads. For those uvicorn paused reading on the main thread and resumed it in a task.

import asyncio
import contextvars
import sys

cvar1 = contextvars.ContextVar("cvar1")
cvar2 = contextvars.ContextVar("cvar2")
cvar3 = contextvars.ContextVar("cvar3")


def print_diagnostics(label):
    task = t.get_name() if (t := asyncio.current_task()) else None
    context = {c.name: v for c, v in contextvars.copy_context().items()}
    print(f"{label}: {task=}, {context=}\n{'-' * 80}")


class DemoProtocol(asyncio.Protocol):
    def __init__(self, on_conn_lost):
        self.transport = None
        self.on_conn_lost = on_conn_lost
        self.tasks = set()

    def connection_made(self, transport):
        print_diagnostics("connection_made")

        self.transport = transport

    def data_received(self, data):
        print_diagnostics("data_received")

        task = asyncio.create_task(self.asgi())
        self.tasks.add(task)
        task.add_done_callback(self.tasks.discard)

        self.transport.pause_reading()

    def connection_lost(self, exc):
        print_diagnostics("connection_lost")
        if not self.on_conn_lost.done():
            self.on_conn_lost.set_result(True)

    async def asgi(self):
        print_diagnostics("asgi start")

        cvar1.set(True)

        # make sure that we only resume after the pause
        # otherwise the resume does nothing
        while not self.transport._paused:
            await asyncio.sleep(0.1)

        cvar2.set(True)

        self.transport.resume_reading()

        cvar3.set(True)

        print_diagnostics("asgi end")


async def main():
    print(f"Python: {sys.version}\n{'-' * 80}")

    loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
    on_conn_lost = loop.create_future()

    host, port = "127.0.0.1", 8888

    async with await loop.create_server(lambda: DemoProtocol(on_conn_lost), host, port):
        reader, writer = await asyncio.open_connection(host, port)
        writer.write(b"anything")
        await writer.drain()
        writer.close()
        await writer.wait_closed()
        await on_conn_lost


if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())
Python: 3.14.0 (main, Oct 14 2025, 21:27:55) [Clang 20.1.4 ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
connection_made: task=None, context={}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
data_received: task=None, context={}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
asgi start: task='Task-4', context={}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
asgi end: task='Task-4', context={'cvar2': True, 'cvar3': True, 'cvar1': True}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
connection_lost: task=None, context={'cvar2': True, 'cvar1': True}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The asgi task sets three context variables:

  1. cvar1 is set at the beginning of the function, which may or may not be before the reading is paused.
  2. cvar2 is set after the reading is paused.
  3. cvar3 is set after the reading is resumed.

The context variables that have been set in the task before the reading is resumed (cvar1 and cvar2) leak out of the task into the main thread.

CPython versions tested on:

3.14

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. added
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    on Nov 3, 2025
  2. added
    3.13only security fixes
    3.14bugs and security fixes
    3.15pre-release feature fixes, bugs and security fixes
    on Nov 3, 2025
  3. kumaraditya303 commented on Dec 14, 2025

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    Output on Windows:

    ❯ ./python.bat main.py 
    Running Debug|x64 interpreter...
    Python: 3.15.0a2+ (heads/main:af7cca3c39d, Dec 14 2025, 16:45:59) [MSC v.1944 64 bit (AMD64)]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    connection_made: task=None, context={}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    data_received: task=None, context={}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    asgi start: task='Task-5', context={}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    asgi end: task='Task-5', context={'cvar3': True, 'cvar1': True, 'cvar2': True}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    connection_lost: task=None, context={}
    ---------------------------------------

    The context of connection_lost is empty which suggests that this bug is not present in windows implementation, still I'll double check it once I add tests on the PR.

  4. pmeier commented on Dec 14, 2025

    @pmeier
    Author

    Both the bug report as well as the regression tests in uvicorn also suggest that Windows is not affected.

  5. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 21, 2026
  6. kumaraditya303 commented on Mar 21, 2026

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    The fix is merged in main branch, I'll prefer to wait for some time before backporting this to older branch just to makes sure that if any bug pops up it only affects main branch.

  7. Kludex commented on Mar 21, 2026

    @Kludex

    Which older branch?

  8. kumaraditya303 commented on Mar 21, 2026

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    3.14 and 3.13 branches

  9. Kludex commented on Mar 21, 2026

    @Kludex

    Makes sense. Thanks for the PR. :)

  10. moved this from Todo to Done in asyncioon Mar 21, 2026
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 25, 2026
  12. kumaraditya303 commented on Jul 23, 2026

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    After much thought I think backporting this is too risky as it a large behavior change of old code. Keeping this for 3.15+.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

3.15pre-release feature fixes, bugs and security fixestopic-asynciotype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

  • Status
    Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions