Repository navigation
Type object's ob_type does not get set when tp_bases is set before PyType_Ready #104614
Description
Activity
- addedtype-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dump
on May 18, 2023 cc @ericsnowcurrently as the author of #103912.
Verified that the following diff solves this issue, and the test suite passes. (Still not sure whether it has any unintended side-effects though)
diff --git a/Objects/typeobject.c b/Objects/typeobject.c index 2fbcafe91a..495e123f8f 100644 --- a/Objects/typeobject.c +++ b/Objects/typeobject.c @@ -6990,10 +6990,6 @@ type_ready_pre_checks(PyTypeObject *type) static int type_ready_set_bases(PyTypeObject *type) { - if (lookup_tp_bases(type) != NULL) { - return 0; - } - /* Initialize tp_base (defaults to BaseObject unless that's us) */ PyTypeObject *base = type->tp_base; if (base == NULL && type != &PyBaseObject_Type) {
I should have a fix up shortly.
@lysnikolaou, please verify that gh-105122 fixes the problem. If not, what would be a good way to reproduce the problem?
Reacted by Lysandros Nikolaou and Christoph Gohlke- added a commit that references this issue
on Jun 1, 2023 - added a commit that references this issue
on Jun 1, 2023 main and 3.12 should be good now.
- added a commit that references this issue
on Jun 2, 2023 Thanks for the fix. This currently crashes multiple-inheritance code generated by both Cython and pybind11 (@rwgk), so this is a blocker for us (and at least some of our users) testing Py3.12b1. The bug is also difficult to work around, so I'd rather wait for Py3.12b2.
Reacted by Lysandros Nikolaou- added 2 commits that reference this issue
on Jun 5, 2023 @scoder, do you mean the issue is fixed for you with the patch I landed, or that the patch caused a new problem, or that the issue still isn't fixed, or something else? I think you meant the first one, but I want to be sure. 😄
- This fix resolves the issue, so the next beta release should work again.Reacted by Eric Snow
Thanks for clarifying. It's a relief to hear that. 😄
per https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/2023-June/045325.html There may still be issues with PyQt6 / sip .
I still see this segfault with current CPython main and it is reported that the failure bisects back to #103912 as well.
Reacted by Eric SnowI'm the person who posted that email - the issue currently is that:
import sys from PyQt6.QtWidgets import QWidget, QApplication class Mixin: pass class Command(Mixin, QWidget): pass app = QApplication(sys.argv) cmd = Command() cmd.show() app.exec()
Segfaults in:
#0 _PyDict_Next (op=0x0, ppos=0x7fffffffbcd0, pkey=0x7fffffffbcd8, pvalue=0x7fffffffbce0, phash=phash@entry=0x0) at Objects/dictobject.c:2114 #1 0x000055555572a2d9 in PyDict_Next (op=<optimized out>, ppos=<optimized out>, pkey=<optimized out>, pvalue=<optimized out>) at Objects/dictobject.c:2189 #2 0x00007ffff2436499 in trawl_hierarchy(_typeobject*, qpycore_metaobject*, QMetaObjectBuilder&, QList<EnumFlag>&, QList<_qpycore_pyqtSignal const*>&, QMap<unsigned int, std::pair<_object*, _object*> >&) () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #3 0x00007ffff2436cc7 in trawl_hierarchy(_typeobject*, qpycore_metaobject*, QMetaObjectBuilder&, QList<EnumFlag>&, QList<_qpycore_pyqtSignal const*>&, QMap<unsigned int, std::pair<_object*, _object*> >&) () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #4 0x00007ffff2436cc7 in trawl_hierarchy(_typeobject*, qpycore_metaobject*, QMetaObjectBuilder&, QList<EnumFlag>&, QList<_qpycore_pyqtSignal const*>&, QMap<unsigned int, std::pair<_object*, _object*> >&) () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #5 0x00007ffff24357ba in qpycore_get_dynamic_metaobject(_sipWrapperType*) [clone .part.0] () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #6 0x00007ffff24363d8 in qpycore_get_qmetaobject(_sipWrapperType*, _sipTypeDef const*) () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #7 0x00007ffff242a4e5 in qpycore_qobject_finalisation(_object*, QObject*, _object*, _object**) () from /home/florian/proj/qutebrowser/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6/QtCore.abi3.so #8 0x00007ffff74f0569 in sipSimpleWrapper_init (self=0x7ffff7652840, args=(), kwds=0x0) at sip_core.c:8950 #9 0x000055555575906b in type_call (type=<optimized out>, type@entry=0x555555ea2470, args=args@entry=(), kwds=kwds@entry=0x0) at Objects/typeobject.c:1671 #10 0x00005555556eb3b2 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall (tstate=tstate@entry=0x555555c76688 <_PyRuntime+475432>, callable=callable@entry=<PyQt6.sip.wrappertype at remote 0x555555ea2470>, args=args@entry=0x7ffff7f7f078, nargs=<optimized out>, keywords=keywords@entry=0x0) at Objects/call.c:240 [...]
And indeed I could bisect this to de64e75. The
main
branch fails in the same way.Happy to open a new issue, but I'm first trying to see if the PyQt author can perhaps
help boil this down to a more minimal example not requiring PyQt.@The-Compiler, this is a separate issue, related to tp_dict rather than tp_bases and ob_type. It would be worth opening a new issue for this.
In the meantime, is the failure with a builtin static type or a user-defined type? Was PyType_Ready() called on that type already? Do you have the full stack trace?
Reacted by Lysandros NikolaouPresumably the crashing code is trying to use the dict returned by
sipPyTypeDict()and I'm guessing that that function basically returnspytype->tp_dictand that thepytypein question is a static builtin type. If that's the case then the failure makes sense sincetp_dictfor static builtin types is now NULL. In 3.12 we added an internal getter function (_PyType_GetDict()viaPy_BUILD_CORE) but not a public one.This sounds like gh-105227. If so, let's continue the conversation there. If not then let's create a new issue.
Either way, I'm closing this issue again.
Bug report
This came up while testing numpy on 3.12. A bug report has been filed on numpy/numpy#23766. It's happening due to #103912, which introduced an additional check for
tp_basesnot being NULL intype_ready_set_bases, which is called fromPyType_Ready.numpy sets
tp_basesmanually before callingPyType_Ready, which means that the afore-mentioned check succeeds, and so, the line that setsob_typedoes not get executed (it used to before #103912), which leads to a segmentation fault later on, when trying to setmro.This looks like a bug, but I'm not sure whether that's expected and numpy should be adjusted. If the latter is true, should a note be added in the
What's newdocument?Linked PRs