Skip to content

argparse: remove redundant len() #104273

Description

@buraksaler

Feature or enhancement

I decreased calling of redundant len() function.

Pitch

(Explain why this feature or enhancement should be implemented and how it would be used.
Add examples, if applicable.)

Previous discussion

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. itamaro commented on May 7, 2023

    @itamaro
    Contributor

    hello @buraksaler!

    it is not clear from this issue what len() calls you are referring to and why they are redundant.

    looking at the linked PR, I'm inferring you refer to the argparse module, where you suggest replacing 3 len() calls with one.
    while the change looks functionally correct to me, any change has inherent risks, so making such a change should be justifiable.
    can you explain the benefits of making this change? it looks like the intention could have been improving performance by caching the result of a function call, in which case, you should provide benchmarking results (micro or macro) or profiling data showing the improvement from making this change.

  2. changed the title [-]redundant len() calling[/-] [+]argparse: remove redundant len()[/+] on May 7, 2023
  3. terryjreedy commented on May 7, 2023

    @terryjreedy
    Member

    Justification: indent is a parameter of the helper function get_lines. It is not rebound within the function. Its length is therefore a constant within the function. Hence len(indent) is only needed once.

    Calculating common subexpressions just once is a common optimization. I don't think benchmarking is needed.

  4. added
    performancePerformance or resource usage
    and removed
    type-featureA feature request or enhancement
    on May 7, 2023
  5. hauntsaninja commented on May 7, 2023

    @hauntsaninja
    Contributor

    I guess I'm okay with the specific PR, but in general we discourage microoptimisations in cold code, especially if done without any kind of benchmarking. These cost reviewer time, can hurt readability and if poorly done run the risk of regressions. I certainly wouldn't welcome PRs doing CSE wherever possible for calls to len in the standard library.

    You'd need several millions of lines of help for this to add up to anything meaningful.

  6. added a commit that references this issue on May 7, 2023
  7. added a commit that references this issue on May 8, 2023
  8. added a commit that references this issue on May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions