Repository navigation
Implement PEP 695 #103763
Description
Activity
PEP 695 – Type Parameter Syntax
Wow. This syntax looks so cool. It reminds me of many generic expressions in other languages, such as C++ and Rust. (while the increases the learning curve of Python)
I'll see what I can help here.
I feel we should defend the intuitive readability of python irrespective of what.
- added a commit that references this issue
on May 16, 2023 The implementation is done. The next step is #103921, the documentation.
Reacted by Maxim Martynov- added a commit that references this issue
on May 16, 2023 @JelleZijlstra - I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but is the specification and implementation of PEP 695 sufficiently stabilized that I could look into updating Ruff's parser and semantic model to support them?
I don't expect more major changes, no. There are currently no open PEP 695-related bugs; if anything else changes it would be as a result of new feedback we receive during the beta phase.
Reacted by Charlie Marsh
We should implement PEP-695. Some discussion of the implementation is at https://github.com/erictraut/cpython/issues. I will open a draft PR momentarily.
TODO:
Linked PRs