Skip to content

issubclass() is inconsistent with generic aliases #101162

Description

@serhiy-storchaka

Instances of types.GenericAlias are accepted as the first argument of issubclass():

>>> issubclass(list[int], object)
True
>>> issubclass(list[int], type)
False

while instances of typing.GenericAlias are not:

>>> issubclass(typing.List[int], object)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: issubclass() arg 1 must be a class
>>> issubclass(typing.List[int], type)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: issubclass() arg 1 must be a class

Although both are rejected if the second argument is an abstract class:

>>> issubclass(list[int], collections.abc.Sequence)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/serhiy/py/cpython/Lib/abc.py", line 123, in __subclasscheck__
    return _abc_subclasscheck(cls, subclass)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: issubclass() arg 1 must be a class
>>> issubclass(typing.List[int], collections.abc.Sequence)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/serhiy/py/cpython/Lib/abc.py", line 123, in __subclasscheck__
    return _abc_subclasscheck(cls, subclass)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: issubclass() arg 1 must be a class

Usually issubclass(x, y) is preceded by the check isinstance(x, type), so the final result will always be false since 3.11, but if that check is omitted, you can see a difference.

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. sobolevn commented on Apr 8, 2023

    @sobolevn
    Member

    This happens because PyObject_IsSubclass uses abstract_get_bases which returns (object,) for list[int], but raises an error for typing.List[int]:

    >>> list[int].__bases__
    (<class 'object'>,)
    >>> import typing
    >>> typing.List[int].__bases__
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "/Users/sobolev/Desktop/cpython/Lib/typing.py", line 1307, in __getattr__
        raise AttributeError(attr)
    AttributeError: __bases__. Did you mean: '__args__'?

    But, we can easily change this and forbid __bases__ access for types.GenericAlias objects by adding it to attr_exceptions.

    As the result, everything is going to work the same as typing._GenericAlias:

    >>> list[int].__bases__
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    AttributeError: __bases__. Did you mean: '__args__'?
    
    >>> issubclass(list[int], object)
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    TypeError: issubclass() arg 1 must be a class

    Moreover, all typing/types/genericalias tests pass with this change.
    I think that it is a reasonable thing to do. Because GenericAlias already has __mro_entries__ method and exposing __bases__ does not actually solve any problems as far as I know.

  2. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 8, 2023
  3. added a commit that references this issue on Aug 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions