You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Support providing AbortSignal to the fs.stat functions #57751
Currently fs.stat does not support providing an AbortSignal to fail-fast during teardown, unlike basically all other fs operations
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
That the StatOptions object have a new field signal?: AbortSignal and when that signal emits an "abort" event the underlying OS FS actions is aborted an the callback parameter of stat is called with an AbortError and undefined.
Futhermore, the async version of stat would also support this option but instead would reject the promise with an AbortError.
There has been no activity on this feature request for 5 months. To help maintain relevant open issues, please add the
never-staleIssues and PRs exempt from automated stale handling.
label or close this issue if it should be closed. If not, the issue will be automatically closed 6 months after the last non-automated comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
There has been no activity on this feature request for 5 months. To help maintain relevant open issues, please add the
never-staleIssues and PRs exempt from automated stale handling.
label or close this issue if it should be closed. If not, the issue will be automatically closed 6 months after the last non-automated comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 2, 2025
There has been no activity on this feature request for 5 months. To help maintain relevant open issues, please add the never-staleIssues and PRs exempt from automated stale handling.
label or close this issue if it should be closed. If not, the issue will be automatically closed 6 months after the last non-automated comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
Nokel81 commentedon Oct 2, 2025
This is still relevant and a pr seems to have been opened
github-actions commentedon Apr 1, 2026
There has been no activity on this feature request for 5 months. To help maintain relevant open issues, please add the never-staleIssues and PRs exempt from automated stale handling.
label or close this issue if it should be closed. If not, the issue will be automatically closed 6 months after the last non-automated comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
Nokel81 commentedon Apr 1, 2026
This is still relevant and a pr seems to have been opened
trivikr commentedon Jul 16, 2026
This should be fixed by #63142