Skip to content

meta: beware review comments for long diffs #12554

Description

@vsemozhetbyt

See: #12549 (comment)

I am not sure if this is a known bug and if we should report it to GitHub.

Activity

  1. added
    metaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
    on Apr 20, 2017
  2. jasnell commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @jasnell
    Member

    I would report it, just to be safe.

  3. vsemozhetbyt commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @vsemozhetbyt
    ContributorAuthor

    I've reported via 'Contact GitHub'. Till fixed, maybe we could split very big docs into several parts for review time.

  4. addaleax commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @addaleax
    Member

    Fwiw I also ran into this quite a few times when reviewing the original N-API PR, just describing the location where the comment was supposed to end up worked okay in the end

  5. vsemozhetbyt commented on Apr 21, 2017

    @vsemozhetbyt
    ContributorAuthor

    GitHub Staff answer:

    Thanks for the report! Our team is aware of this issue. I can't promise an ETA for when it might be fixed, but it is on our radar and we'll be sure to write back as soon as we have news.

  6. Trott commented on Aug 2, 2017

    @Trott
    Member

    This issue has been inactive for sufficiently long that it seems like perhaps it should be closed. Feel free to re-open (or leave a comment requesting that it be re-opened) if you disagree. I'm just tidying up and not acting on a super-strong opinion or anything like that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    metaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions