doc: 2019-02-27 meeting notes

doc/meetings/2019-02-27.md

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# Node.js Foundation Modules Team Meeting 2019-02-27
+
+* **Recording**:  https://youtu.be/wYKeySvX8EI
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/276
+* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gXpUwJGPAgHNLqbOdqKEoRQsbdQwqgXAC2kC_tyQ6Tk/edit
+
+## Present
+
+- Myles Borins (@MylesBorins)
+- Gus Caplan (@devsnek)
+- Wesley Wigham (@weswigham)
+- Geoffrey Booth (@GeoffreyBooth)
+- Jan Krems (@jkrems)
+- Saleh Abdel Motaal (@smotaal)
+- Jeremiah Senkpiel (@Fishrock123)
+- Guy Bedford (@guybedford)
+- Matt DuLeone (@mduleone)
+- Jordan Harband (@ljharb)
+
+## Agenda
+
+Extracted from **modules-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+### Note
+
+This is an out of band follow up to last week’s meeting. The majority of this week’s discussion will be based on the following doc
+
+https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DSWrdV1fzXvlOdTZ5MngDX7v6CU4ZUheJ7ysOZ2uK0w/edit?usp=sharing
+
+Discussion in this issue
+
+https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/261
+
+We will walk through contentious subjects, attempt to reach consensus quickly, otherwise move towards a vote. We will then review the resulting implementation and attempt to reach consensus that this is what we will move forward with.
+
+### Review Open PRs (15 minute timebox)
+
+All discussion are limited to 5 minutes and will be ended early if it is obvious there is no consensus
+
+* -m alias for --type=module [#39](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/39)
+
+Consensus to land and discuss further if necessary.
+Also discussing  [#45](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/45).
+
+Can land in 48 hours based on review
+
+* Exports main [#41](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/41)
+
+To be revisited after extension resolution; ask to review extension resolution in this meeting in order to unblock
+
+* esm: add experimental .json support to loader [#43](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/43)
+
+Skip for now
+
+* Warn about `--type` with shebang [#37](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/37)
+
+* ESM_FORMAT: Avoid reading package.json when extension is unambiguous [#33](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/33)
+
+#44 adds tests to be merged into other PR #45
+
+### Discussion (40 minutes)
+
+* Review last weeks discussion
+  * 5 minute timebox
+
+* What is an MVP to upstream?
+
+Reviewing https://github.com/nodejs/modules/pull/280, the revised road map
+  * No objections to overall structure or phases 0 or 1
+
+
+  * 10 minute timebox
+  * Refs:
+    * Minimum to release? [#253](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/253)
+    * Entry points proposal spec and implementation [#32](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/32)
+    * Import file specifier proposal implementation [#256](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/256)
+    * Mode: esm proposal [#247](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/247)
+
+* Loaders
+  * 5 minute timebox
+
+* File Extension Resolution
+  * 10 minute timebox
+  * Refs:
+    * File extension/directory index resolution in ESM [#268](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/268)
+
+* CommonJS interop
+  * 10 minute timebox
+  * Refs:
+    * Proposal for dual ESM/CommonJS packages [#273](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/273)
+    * CommonJS import interoperability decisions [#264](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/264)
+    * Make an update to Dynamic Modules Development in Node.js [#24894](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/24894)
+    * Import named vs default from CommonJS packages [#260](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/260)
+    * Moving forward with Dynamic Modules? [#252](https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/252)
+    * CJS named exports via two-phase execution [#31](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/31)
+    * WIP [Do not merge] - Irp type dynamic modules [#29](https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/29)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+