Skip to content

why are we "stuck" with servers? #808

Closed

Description

@ReinsBrain

If we really wanted to have distributed/decentralized control of information then why aren't we using IPFS? Without even ranting about use of angular, I can't get behind this project because it has ignored the superior work done with IPFS. Please go back to the drawing board.

Activity

  1. RubenVerborgh commented on Sep 30, 2018

    @RubenVerborgh
    Contributor

    superior work done with IPFS

    Superior in what regard specifically?

    Solid and IPFS are solving different problems. IPFS could be used as a Solid backend, but doesn't have to be.

    Note that one of the initial server developers (@nicola) is now with Protocol Labs, so we are very well aware of the space.

    Without even ranting about use of angular

    Why would that be a problem?

    Some repositories of Solid use Angular, but you don't need any of them for a working system.

  2. ReinsBrain commented on Oct 1, 2018

    @ReinsBrain
    Author

    Solid and IPFS are solving different problems

    If the problems IPFS and Solid are solving are mutually exclusive then Solid is not solving core problems. Solid should be built upon IPFS and can add some extra "problem-solving".

  3. RubenVerborgh commented on Oct 1, 2018

    @RubenVerborgh
    Contributor

    Solid is not solving core problems

    Just different problems 😄

    Solid should be built upon IPFS

    As I wrote above, it can be one of the backends we support. There are other options, like https://safenetwork.tech/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions