Repository navigation
OIDC integration v1 #348
Description
v1
Ldnode side
- Server capabilities discovery: Implement server capability discovery #347
- Switch between WebID-TLS and OIDC Making authentication strategy an option #346
- Accounts APIs
/api/accountsAccounts API v1 #339 @nicola - OIDC APIs
/api/oidcOIDC Integration #330 @dmitrizagidulin - Sync Accounts APIs and OIDC APIs @dmitrizagidulin @nicola
- Test workflow Designing the scenario for accounts with OIDC #345 @deiu @nicola
- Email support for account creation and account recovery using node mailer as email service #335
Application side
OIDC side
- Fix temporary signin.html page, test webid -> oidc provider discovery
- Test user creation api endpoint (integration w oidc)
- Test login workflow with two OIDC providers (like localhost & freecandy.space)
- Implement the 'verify the webid' step during login process
/api/oidc/ endpoints:
/api/oidc/rp- relying party callback
Have a look at the scenario to understand the steps
Activity
[-]OIDC integration[/-][+]OIDC integration v1[/+]dmitrizagidulin commentedon Jun 2, 2016
Moving 'fix async / race condition problem' / 'implement persistent client store' item to the next version
nicola commentedon Jun 2, 2016
Didn't I implement this already?
dmitrizagidulin commentedon Jun 2, 2016
Partly. The PR isn't working, which is fine, the functionality from it is being merged into upstream libraries.
nicola commentedon Jun 15, 2016
hey @dmitrizagidulin what is the state of this?
dmitrizagidulin commentedon Jun 15, 2016
The individual items are implemented, the issue can be closed.
nicola commentedon Jun 16, 2016
Perfect!
Let's leave till they are not in master, no?Do we have any time line to bring oidc in?
dmitrizagidulin commentedon Jun 16, 2016
Sure thing.
Not sure if we have a timeline specifically, but I'm tracking the remaining items at this epic here: #353
melvincarvalho commentedon Jan 10, 2018
@dmitrizagidulin ok to close this now?
melvincarvalho commentedon Jan 24, 2018
@dmitrizagidulin gentle bump on this. Will close this issue soon if there's not an objection.
dmitrizagidulin commentedon Jan 24, 2018
@melvincarvalho - ah, thanks! Missed the previous query somehow.
Yes, this should be ok to close (closing it, in fact).