Repository navigation
C++: Fix Expr <-> DataFlow::Node mapping for glvalue qualifiers
#23046
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
MathiasVP
wants to merge
2
commits into
github:main
Choose a base branch
from
MathiasVP:fix-gl-value-as-expr
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+765
−743
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -246,15 +246,37 @@ private module Cached { | |
|
|
||
| /** Holds if `node` should be an `IndirectOperand` that maps `node.asExpr()` to `e`. */ | ||
| private predicate exprNodeShouldBeIndirectOperand(IndirectOperand node, Expr e, int n) { | ||
| exists(ArgumentOperand operand | | ||
| exists(ArgumentOperand operand | isIndirectOperandOfArgument(node, operand, e, n) | | ||
| // If `x` has type `Foo` in a call such `x.f()` the `VariableAddress` | ||
| // instruction (which is of type `glvalue<Foo>`) is the qualifier. | ||
| // So the `DataFlow::Node` we want to represent `x` is the indirection of | ||
| // the qualifier (which will then have type `Foo`). | ||
| // Since the node -> expression mapping is one-to-many we additionally need to | ||
| // check that the specific expression we map to is also a glvalue. For example, | ||
| // in `(*x).f()` the qualifier generates IR like: | ||
| // ``` | ||
| // r1(glval<Foo *>) = VariableAddress[x] : | ||
| // r2(Foo *) = Load[x] : &:r1 | ||
| // r3(glval<Foo>) = CopyValue : r2 | ||
| // ``` | ||
| // The qualifier is associated with both `*x` and the lvalue-to-rvalue | ||
| // conversion of `x`. Only `*x` is a glvalue and should map to the | ||
| // indirect qualifier node; the converted `x` is a pointer prvalue and | ||
| // should map to the direct qualifier node. Restricting `e` to only be | ||
| // expressions for which `e.isGLValueCategory()` holds ensures that `*x` | ||
| // is the result of calling `asExpr()` while `asIndirectExpr()` gives | ||
| // `x`. | ||
| operand.isGLValue() and | ||
| operand instanceof ThisArgumentOperand and | ||
| e.isGLValueCategory() | ||
|
Comment on lines
+269
to
+271
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I did run DCA, and there's nothing to report. There's a backlinked PR! You're being a bit too nitpicky here, Copilot |
||
| or | ||
| // When an argument (qualifier or positional) is a prvalue and the | ||
| // parameter (qualifier or positional) is a (const) reference, IR | ||
| // construction introduces a temporary `IRVariable`. The `VariableAddress` | ||
| // instruction has the argument as its `getConvertedResultExpression` | ||
| // result. However, the instruction actually represents the _address_ of | ||
| // the argument. So to fix this mismatch, we have the indirection of the | ||
| // `VariableAddressInstruction` map to the expression. | ||
| isIndirectOperandOfArgument(node, operand, e, n) and | ||
| irTempOperandConversionFlows(operand) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, those are some good points, Copilot. I'll need to give that a think and see if there's a problem 🤔