Skip to content

Proposal: Improve input validation in a Python example #3233

Open

Description

@willian-mayer

Hi! I'm interested in contributing to this repository.

I've been exploring the Python examples and would like to help improve the reliability of one of the scripts.

I'm planning to identify an example that could benefit from better input validation or error handling, and propose a small, focused improvement.

Before making changes, I'd like to ask whether this type of contribution would be welcome, as suggested in the CONTRIBUTING guidelines.

Thanks for your time!

Activity

  1. carlinshree commented on Nov 11, 2026

    @carlinshree

    The process_data function in examples/data_parser.py currently lacks any schema validation and crashes when receiving unexpected nested dictionaries. Could you clarify if you intend to implement a lightweight solution using pydantic or if you prefer sticking to standard library jsonschema validation to keep dependencies minimal?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions