Skip to content

podman quadlet install --replace does not fully replace the old file

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 13, 2026 in podman-container-tools/podman • Updated Sep 24, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/containers/podman/v5 (Go)

Affected versions

>= 5.7.0, < 5.8.6

Patched versions

5.8.6

Description

Impact

When running podman quadlet install --replace to replace a Quadlet file, if the original Quadlet is larger than the new Quadlet, the file would not be truncated and content from the original would be preserved. There is no risk of information leakage as the user already had access to the Quadlet in order to replace it, and in most cases, this would only lead to invalid Quadlet files (see podman-container-tools/podman#29013). However, security-related options from the end of the old Quadlet could be included in the new Quadlet, and if the truncation resulted in a valid Quadlet file, this could result in undesirable behavior. For example, running podman quadlet install --replace to remove a single line from the end of a Quadlet - including security-sensitive content, like AddCapability - will fail, and the option will continue to be used. Further, with Volume Quadlets, this can include additional mounts which can cause content to be unintentionally exposed into containers. If, later, the image is updated then compromised content might be leaked to an attacker.

First introduced in commit 0ea4eaee70b7458bcc99d875529761faf5172651 with podman 5.7.0

Patches

a38a9b7d20915c55e6f3c451101ae72d6da33742 (fixed in 6.0.0)

d3adfdeec7d5c9eee5a6978df3bee62a866c958d d4fe9154ec6e32a02d5fcd096c4a27c38f2040f4 (for v5.8 branch, fixed in 5.8.6)

Workarounds

Manually copy the quadlet files to the quadlet directory.

Credits

Podman thanks Christopher Lusk clusk@northecho.dev (North Echo Security Research) for reporting the security impact of this problem.

References

@Luap99 Luap99 published to podman-container-tools/podman Aug 13, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 13, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 24, 2026
Reviewed Sep 24, 2026
Last updated Sep 24, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

Incomplete Cleanup

The product does not properly clean up and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-19730

GHSA ID

GHSA-fx76-2j3w-2mx6

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.