You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Investigate the feasibility of implementing executemany #36
How to insert multiple rows without a traditional for loop?
Something like executemany in psycopg2
I am asking because I failed to find any example or method in the documentation.
Actually what I am doing is:
async def insertdemo(data, dns=DNS):
async with asyncpg.create_pool(dns) as pool:
async with pool.acquire() as con:
async with con.transaction():
stmt = '''insert into demo (num, name) select * from unnest($1::int[], $2::varchar[]);'''
await con.execute(stmt, *zip(*data))
However, it would be good to have at least executemany method, so
for row in data:
await con.execute(query, *row)
can be executed as
await con.executemany(query, data)
where data could be any iterable.
BTW. How con.execute(query, *row) executed multiple times works exactly? Does it send each statement one by one over network or are multiple rows bundled into a batch?
# Pass data to fill a query placeholders and let Psycopg perform
# the correct conversion (no more SQL injections!)
>>> cur.execute("INSERT INTO test (num, data) VALUES (%s, %s)",
... (100, "abc'def"))
so asyncpg connection execute method seems to be incompatible with DB-API?
If args is non-empty then raise deprecation warning. If both args and data are specified, then raise TypeErrror. After few asyncpg versions, the args positional parameters could be removed.
asyncpg explicitly supports prepared statements, so there is no need for a dedicated executemany method. Simply iterate over a loop, calling the prepared statement:
ps=awaitconn.prepare('INSERT INTO test(num, data) VALUES($1, $2)')
forrowindata:
awaitps.fetchval(*row)
Or, since the statements are prepared by default, you can use even simpler form:
forrowindata:
awaitconn.execute('INSERT INTO test(num, data) VALUES($1, $2)', *row)
IMHO, dedicated executemany method would simplify API. It is easier to write
await conn.executemany('...', data)
than the whole loop. If this was implemented at Cython level, wouldn't it be faster as well?
I hope you do not mind, I will repeat the question from my first comment - are the rows iterated in the loop sent one by one or are the statements batched?
IMHO, dedicated executemany method would simplify API. It is easier to write
await conn.executemany('...', data)
than the whole loop. If this was implemented at Cython level, wouldn't it be faster as well?
No, high-level APIs in asyncpg are not Cythoned, and even if they were, the perf difference would be minimal.
I hope you do not mind, I will repeat the question from my first comment - are the rows iterated in the loop sent one by one or are the statements batched?
There is no such thing as batching, psycopg2 does the same row-by-row statement execution.
That said, event loop overhead needs to be benchmarked for this case. If it turns out to be significant, we will look into implementing the executemany method.
Meanwhile you can create a helper method using the loop technique mentioned above.
Activity
[-]Insert many row with prepare query[/-][+]How to insert many rows?[/+]wrobell commentedon Nov 8, 2016
According to https://magic.io/blog/asyncpg-1m-rows-from-postgres-to-python/
asyncpgsupports arrays and composite types, so I can imagine that determining semantics ofvalueincon.excute(query, value)can be tricky.However, it would be good to have at least
executemanymethod, socan be executed as
where
datacould be any iterable.BTW. How
con.execute(query, *row)executed multiple times works exactly? Does it send each statement one by one over network or are multiple rows bundled into a batch?wrobell commentedon Nov 8, 2016
Also, looking at http://initd.org/psycopg/docs/usage.html
so
asyncpgconnectionexecutemethod seems to be incompatible with DB-API?wrobell commentedon Nov 8, 2016
What about changing
executemethod signature toIf
argsis non-empty then raise deprecation warning. If bothargsanddataare specified, then raiseTypeErrror. After fewasyncpgversions, theargspositional parameters could be removed.elprans commentedon Nov 14, 2016
asyncpg explicitly supports prepared statements, so there is no need for a dedicated
executemanymethod. Simply iterate over a loop, calling the prepared statement:Or, since the statements are prepared by default, you can use even simpler form:
wrobell commentedon Nov 15, 2016
IMHO, dedicated
executemanymethod would simplify API. It is easier to writethan the whole loop. If this was implemented at Cython level, wouldn't it be faster as well?
I hope you do not mind, I will repeat the question from my first comment - are the rows iterated in the loop sent one by one or are the statements batched?
elprans commentedon Nov 15, 2016
No, high-level APIs in asyncpg are not Cythoned, and even if they were, the perf difference would be minimal.
There is no such thing as batching,
psycopg2does the same row-by-row statement execution.That said, event loop overhead needs to be benchmarked for this case. If it turns out to be significant, we will look into implementing the
executemanymethod.Meanwhile you can create a helper method using the loop technique mentioned above.
[-]How to insert many rows?[/-][+]Investigate the feasibility of implementing `executemany`[/+]Implement the Connection.executemany() method
Implement the Connection.executemany() method
Implement the Connection.executemany() method
Implement the Connection.executemany() method